<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New project: The Carbon Economy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xplane.com/xblog/2009/11/05/new-project-the-carbon-economy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xplane.com/xblog/2009/11/05/new-project-the-carbon-economy/</link>
	<description>ISSN 1543-7477. Published by XPLANE since 1999.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 18:11:08 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Een discrepantie tussen beeld, geluid en inhoud</title>
		<link>http://www.xplane.com/xblog/2009/11/05/new-project-the-carbon-economy/comment-page-1/#comment-479</link>
		<dc:creator>Een discrepantie tussen beeld, geluid en inhoud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xplane.com/xblog/?p=6399#comment-479</guid>
		<description>[...] heeft in samenwerking met The Economist de informatieve video “The Carbon Economy” gemaakt. Alle ingrediënten zijn goed gekozen, krachtige verhalende muziek, sprekend [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] heeft in samenwerking met The Economist de informatieve video “The Carbon Economy” gemaakt. Alle ingrediënten zijn goed gekozen, krachtige verhalende muziek, sprekend [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jussi Jokinen</title>
		<link>http://www.xplane.com/xblog/2009/11/05/new-project-the-carbon-economy/comment-page-1/#comment-477</link>
		<dc:creator>Jussi Jokinen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 17:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xplane.com/xblog/?p=6399#comment-477</guid>
		<description>Nice video on important topic. 
One sidenote however: carbon dioxide emissions cut visualization is quite misleading. Whereas Japan and EU both use 1990 as reference point of emission cuts, US uses the year 2005. So, actually compared to EU&#039;s 20% (30% if other countries commit to equally big cuts) US only promises about 4% cuts... it&#039;s a start but weak compared to rivals and I think this should be visualized in video, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice video on important topic.<br />
One sidenote however: carbon dioxide emissions cut visualization is quite misleading. Whereas Japan and EU both use 1990 as reference point of emission cuts, US uses the year 2005. So, actually compared to EU&#8217;s 20% (30% if other countries commit to equally big cuts) US only promises about 4% cuts&#8230; it&#8217;s a start but weak compared to rivals and I think this should be visualized in video, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
